Improper Photography writ
Posted By Lance Stott on September 5, 2009
Despite the title, it’s not really a draft. It was filed in WilCo, but the underlying case was later dismissed, so I didn’t get to argue it.
It’s not often you get to include a raft of sexy photos of half-naked women (and men) in a legal document, so this was a first.
On a serious note, 21.15 “Improper Photography” IS unconstitutional, so if you want to use this brief, contact me.
Comments
Leave a Reply