Petitioner’s Oath
“On my Oath, I hereby state that the allegations contained within my “Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus” are true, according to my belief.”
_______________________
Lance Stott, Petitioner
Certificate of Service
I hereby certify that the attached Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Brief was served on the District Attorney’s Office of Williamson County, this the ___ day of June, 2009.
______________________
Lance Stott,
Attorney for Applicant
Cause Number ____________
In Re * In the District Court
*
Thomas Arnett * 277th Judicial District
*
Applicant * Williamson County, Texas
ORDER
CAME TO BE HEARD, this, the ____ day of _______, 2009 the foregoing Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus in the cause referenced above, and having heard the same, the Petition is hereby: GRANTED/ DENIED.
________________________
Judge Presiding
Index of Authorities
Ashcroft v. American Civil Liberties Union, 542 US 656 (2004).
Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition, 535 US 234 (2002).
Burson v. Freeman, 504 US 191 (1992).
Burstyn, Inc. v. Wilson, 343 US 495 (1952).
Carey v. Brown, 447 US 455 (1980).
City of Chicago v. Morales, 527 U.S. 41 (1999).
City of Houston v. Hill, 482 US 451 (1987).
Davenport v. Garcia, 834 SW2d 4, Tex. (1992).
Democracy Coalition v. City of Austin, 141 S.W.3d 282 (Tex.App.-Austin, 2004).
Erznoznik v Jacksonville, 422 US 205, 217 (1975).
Ex parte Ellis, 275 SW3d 74, (Tex.App- Austin, 2008).
Ex parte Mattox, 883 SW2d 93 (Tex.App.-Austin, 1984).
Ex parte Siebold, 100 U.S. 371 (1879).
Ex parte Weise, 55 S.W.3d 617 (Tex.Crim.App., 2001)
Grayned v. City of Rockford, 408 US 104, 108 (1972).
Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 US 479 (1965).
In re MML, 241 SW3d 546 (Tex.App.-Amarillo 2006)
Jacobellis v. Ohio, 378 US 184 (1964)
Johnson v. State, 755 S.W.2d 92 (Ct.Crim.App, 1988).
Karenev v. Texas, ___ 3d ___ (Ct.Crim.App., 2009)
Kimbrough v. Coca-Cola, 521 S.W.2d 719 1975).
Massachusetts v. Oakes, 491 U.S. 576 (1989).
McNamara v. Freedom Newspapers, 802 S.W.2d 901 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi, 1991).
Nussenzweig v. DiCorcia, 11 Misc 3d 1051, Supreme Court, New York County (2006).
R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul, 505 US 377 (1992).
Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union, 521 U.S. 844 (1997).
Republican Party of Minn. v. White, 536 US 765 (2002).
Sable Communications v. Federal Communications Commission, 492 US 115 (1989).
Simon & Schuster v. New York State Crime Victims Board, 502 US 105 (1991).
Sullivan v. State, 986 SW2d 708 (Tex.App.-Dallas, 1999).
Texas Dept. of Transp. v. Barber, 111 SW3d 86, 93 (Tex.2003).
Time, Inc., v. Hill, 385 U.S. 374 (1967).
United States v. Playboy Entertainment Group, 529 US 803 (2000).
United States v. Stevens, 071808 FED3, 05-2497, (3d. Cir. 2008).
United States v. Williams, 553 US ____, (2008).
Vasquez v. State, ___ 3d ___, (Tex.App.-Dallas, 2007).
Ward v. Rock Against Racism, 491 US 781 (1989).